PreferiumAEOAI Search
Google AI Mode and ChatGPT test new citation positions
July 2026 tests put source links at the bottom of AI answers or behind an overlay. What was observed, and why citations and visits need separate reporting.
Jump to a section
In July 2026, observers reported changes to where Google AI Mode and ChatGPT displayed source links. The examples raise a practical reporting question: if a link becomes harder to find, how would you distinguish that from a change in which pages get cited?
What was spotted in the week to 24 July 2026
On July 22, Search Engine Roundtable reported that both Google AI Mode and ChatGPT are testing citation cards placed at the bottom of the response, rather than woven into the text.
The two engines are doing it slightly differently:
- Google AI Mode — spotted by Sachin Patel — appears to anchor the user to the bottom of the answer, dropping them directly onto the citation card when they interact with certain results (the behavior showed up around free product listings).
- ChatGPT — spotted by Brodie Clark on his SERP Alert account — is testing a clickable overlay box for its sources. In his words, “ChatGPT seems to be experimenting with how it’s linking out to sources from its output.”
These observations describe tests. They do not establish a permanent rollout, its reach or an effect on referral traffic.
Why placement matters to publishers
Citation placement is where that tension gets resolved. An inline citation sits right next to the claim it supports — it’s read in context, at the moment the reader is most curious about “says who?” A citation parked at the bottom, or behind an overlay, is further from that moment of curiosity and easier to skip. Same citation, different odds of a click.
Keep content decisions separate
The screenshots concern link placement. They do not show whether retrieval or source selection changed at the same time. There is no reason in this evidence alone to rewrite a page that remains useful and accurate.
The content checks remain straightforward:
- Answer the question in the first two sentences, then support it. It helps a reader find the answer quickly. We laid out the pattern in answer blocks.
- Be unambiguous about who you are and what you claim. Make claims specific and attributable, and include qualifications the evidence requires.
- Make the page trivially machine-readable — clean HTML, real headings, structured data — so the source card, wherever it renders, points at a page that loads fast and confirms the claim.
What this does change for how you advise clients
What moves is the conversion half of the story. If citations are drifting to the bottom of the answer across engines, then “we’re cited” is a weaker win to report on its own. Two adjustments:
- Report citations and clicks as separate metrics. Track whether a client is cited across the engines and whether those citations are actually sending traffic. Treating them as one number hides exactly the effect these tests create.
- Optimize the destination for a skeptical, late click. A reader following a citation should quickly find the material it supports. The landing experience — does the page immediately confirm what the answer promised? — is now part of your AEO work, not a separate CRO project.
